March 24, 2013
-
The God of Steubenville Ohio
Steubenville, Ohio, is the county seat of Jefferson County It sits on the banks of the mighty Ohio River and is a city steeped in rich history and tradition. Known as the City of Murals, Steubenville is home to almost twenty thousand citizens. Founded in 1797, Steubenville is a family friendly community with safe neighborhoods and excellent schools which offer a wide variety of educational opportunities. However, one young man who grew up there had this to say about the community:
“The locals are not liberal at all [and it's] not a diverse place. There’s no Asians, Hispanics, gays or any other minority for that matter except black and there’s some racial tension there as well.”
With a population of over 18,600, Steubenville supports 207 churches. Here is the breakdown: 37 Methodist, 24 Presbyterian, 23 Baptist, 18 Church of Christ, 17 Catholic, 13 Christian, 12 Nazarene, 8 Assembly of God, 6 Church of God, 5 Lutheran, 3 Calvary Chapel, 3 Episcopal, 3 Orthodox, 2 Apostolic, 2 Evangelical,2 Pentecostal, 2 Seventh Day Adventist, 12 Non-Denominational and 15 Other Churches. All within an area of 10.3 square miles.

Steubenville High School is the only public high school in the City’s School District. The school is commonly known by the name of its mascot, Big Red. It sports a student population of over 700 for grades 9 through 12. The big news coming out of Steubenville for the past 30 years does not involve the mills, or murals, or religion, or the shopping malls, or the prosperity of its citizens. The big news coming out of Steubenville has been it’s High School football team, their players and their coaching staff. And this has had it’s effect on the small community. HS football is so important in Steubenville it means more to its citizens than the life of one of their own young women who was brutally raped by two of the Big Red’s star football players who also took nude pictures of her and posted them on the web. Her classmates who witnessed the rape chatted endlessly about it on Twitter and Facebook and the players joked about it and stated they knew their coach would get them out of trouble.
We’re sure you’ve heard the stories. Yes, there was a trial. Yes, the two boys were found guilty in juvenile court. Yes, their sentence of 1 year in a juvenile detention center hardly fits the crime. But this is not the injustice that has reared its ugly head in Steubenville. The big news is not the rape trial. It’s not the sentence passed down. The big news is how the local community has handled the situation. Basically, most of Steubenville’s fine citizens wish the whole thing would just go away so the can get back to crowing about how great their football team is again. Believe it or not, there were over 900 pictures and videos taken of the assault, many of which found their way onto the Internet. Fellow students recorded everything on Instagram, YouTube, cell phone cameras, videos, and the actions of those involved were spelled out in graphic detail in hundreds of disgusting tweets.
Yet the good citizens of Steubenville remain silent concerning the truth of what occurred. It might hurt their storied football team. Then Steubenville might become just another insignificant dot on the map of Ohio, like so many other small towns. And the money would stop rolling in. And the big college scholarships would be a thing of the past. So parents and leaders of school and churches could no longer hold their heads high because the only thing they had to be proud of was their pathetic football team.
One would think that seeing someone’s daughter violated ought to provoke revulsion, outrage or intervention, wouldn’t you say? Not for the good Christian citizens of Steubenville. They tripped all over each other in an effort to prove the victim had it coming. The Police Chief begged for witnesses to come forward. But the sons and daughters of these good church-going people did not respond. The county prosecutor and local judges backed away too. Why? Because of their ties to the football team. In fact, some of the players involved were allowed to keep playing until the 10th game of the season before they were benched. Meanwhile, the two players arrested remained confident that the head football coach would take care of everything. They claimed their coach was joking about the whole story. The boys were not worried in the least.
After the verdicts came down, were the two boys sorry for what they had done? Well, they were sorry that football would not be in their future. Sex offenders aren’t given scholarships to any of the major football mills. There was no mention of being sorry for what they had done to the victim. What did the rest of Ohio think of the decision? A disk Jockey from the University of Toledo had this to say on Twitter:

Even CNN caught flack when their reports of the incident seemed to favor the football players rather than the victim.
The young lady’s testimony at the trail was quite moving. But she almost didn’t testify. The good Christian people of Steubenville threatened both herself and her family. Her own friends testified against her and others suggested her slurring, stumbling, and vomiting the night of the assault didn’t stop her from insinuating consent.
The Attorney General of Ohio has stepped in and has called for a grand jury investigation as to whether others should be charged. We at Table 54 can only hope that he follows through on this. It’s about time people are held accountable for covering up incidents that reflect badly on High School football players. As Prosecutor Marianne Hemmeter said:
“This case isn’t about a YouTube video. This case isn’t about social media. This case isn’t about Big Red football. This case is about a 16-year-old girl who was taken advantage of, toyed with, and humiliated.”
When people act like the good citizens of Steubenville; when the sons and daughters of church-going people refuse to act when someone is so heinously violated; one has to wonder what kind of God these people worship? There’s an easy answer to that question: Their God is High School Football.
Comments (12)
I’m from Ohio, so I’ve been following the case for months. As happy as I am they got some sort of punishment, I’m not surprised it was lenient. Not surprised at all. All of my friends are male, some only 20 years old. I know some of them certainly think the girl ‘had it coming’.
I wouldn’t even call it Rape Culture anymore. Just standard American Culture. Go us.
So sad that so many people are still living in the ancient times of the bible days, woman is the temptress and source of all evil, and the ten commandments even list her right in there with rules for men not to covet her or any other of their neighbors possessions. All of these evil g0ds need to just go away.
The way the case was handled has nothing to do with the fact that there are churches in the town, after all there are many town in the country that would have handled this issue in a similar way. Their attitude toward the case isn’t at all uncommon in this country, unfortunately. Christianity doesn’t call for women to be raped or abused, no less than Islam doesn’t call for terrorists. People just use religion to get people to do whatever, and take advantage of their ignorance.
@Pure_Taint -
We’re from Ohio too. “She had it coming” is a common defense for rapists for as long as we can remember. It is a shame when a people decide to put such little value on the their daughters. You don’t have to look much farther than historical religious misogyny to figure out why this is the case even in the 21st century.
-Y
@an_OM_aly -
Let’s look at the source of the problem:
St. Clement of Alexandria: “Every woman should be filled with shame by the thought that she is a woman…the consciousness of their own nature must evoke feelings of shame”
Tertullian: Women are “the devil’s gateway.”
“Do you know that each of your women is an Eve? The sentence of God – on this sex of yours – lives in this age; the guilt must necessarily live, too. You are the gate of Hell, you are the temptress of the forbidden tree; you are the first deserter of the divine law.”
St. Jerome: “Woman is the root of all evil.”
St. Augustine: “I don’t see what sort of help woman was created to provide man with, if one excludes procreation.”
St. Thomas Aquinas: “So by such a kind of subjection woman is naturally subject to man, because in men the discretion of reason predominates.”
From the Malleus Maleficarum(The Witch Hunters Manual): “They [women] are only ‘imperfect animals’ and ‘crooked’ whereas man belongs to a privileged sex from whose midst Christ emerged.”
St. Paul: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” (1 Timothy 2:12
“But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God…For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.” (1 Corinthians)
“Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.” (Ephesians 5)
“As in all the churches of God’s holy people, women are to remain quiet in the assemblies, since they have no permission to speak: theirs is a subordinate part, as the Law itself says. If there is anything they want to know, they should ask their husbands at home: it is shameful for a woman to speak in the assembly.”
Martin Luther: “The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes.”
“No gown worse becomes a woman than the desire to be wise.”
“Men have broad and large chests, and small narrow hips, and more understanding than women, who have but small and narrow breasts, and broad hips, to the end they should remain at home, sit still, keep house, and bear and bring up children.”
I could go on and on but even women in the church try to minimize these quotations.
-Y
@essien -
Our post has nothing to do with the way the case was handled. It has everything to do with how the community handled themselves in regards to their preference for football over a young woman’s pain and shame. And if indeed there are many small towns in our country that would have had the same attitude and response towards the victim and the perpetrators as did those in Steubenville, then we should all hang our heads in shame because the human race has not advanced very much since the Middle Ages. We at Table 54 prefer not to think of small town America’s populations in such a degrading way. We like to think that people would step up when they see someone being inhumanly treated.
In the first century in which the writers of the New Testament lived, women had no rights, were not allowed an education and were considered chattel, the property of husbands and fathers who could do with them as they wished. Women were beaten and abused and few men thought anything of their plight. They were forced into marriages they did not want and from which they had no recourse to leave. As the quotes in our answer to the last comment show, women were thought of as baby factories and little else. They carried the shame and guilt for the pitiful condition of the world they lived in because Eve talked Adam into sinning. And whether we admit it or not, these are the circumstances under which Christianity was given birth and Christianity continued to carry on the abhorrent traditions under which women were forced to live.
It is only within the last hundred years that the situation for women has changed for the better. And those changes have not taken place overnight. In fact, women’s rights are still being fought for in the courts of this Nation. Steubenville is a perfect example of that. We at Table 54 will NEVER understand how a community of supposed Christian or any other kind of 21st century people could respond to rape and inhumanity in the way the citizens of Steubenville did and continue to do. And for what reason? So their High School Football Program would not be sullied? Please!
-Y
@Table54 -
Those people certainly weren’t acting according to Christian values. They weren’t by allowing their children to live such riotous lives, drinking and living in pride like that, and probably feeling like they could have whatever girls they wanted. They were living outside of all that even before the rape, which was the climax of all this.
That was how women were treated in New Testament times, but nothing you’ve read in the New Testament says women should rightfully be treated as such. It’s like blaming the situations of society today on people preaching the gospel because they were preaching the gospel while these things were going on. People who say Christianity supports or upholds the abuse of women often haven’t read much of the Bible themselves or know truly what Christianity stands for. They just pick out singular verses without understanding of the context of the time or situation to use fulfill their bias against the faith, or any religious faith at all.
@essien - Agree with your first paragraph.
But, if you tell those 1st century people that “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” (1 Timothy 2:12) and “But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God…For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.” (1 Corinthians)and “Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.” (Ephesians 5) “As in all the churches of God’s holy people, women are to remain quiet in the assemblies, since they have no permission to speak: theirs is a subordinate part, as the Law itself says. If there is anything they want to know, they should ask their husbands at home: it is shameful for a woman to speak in the assembly,” you are basically telling them to treat women just like they always do. In fact, you’re telling men that they rule over women as Christ rules over the church. To men of that time this means women are chattel. Second class citizens. And did this attitude prevail? You bet it did. Read the Martin Luther quotes above. Look at women even today. The fundamentalist Christian churches keep women as second class citizens still. Women don’t get equal pay for equal work in this country. And it’s all because of dear old St. Paul. He was a former Jew and wanted to treat Christian women according to the historical Jewish tradition. Of this there is little doubt. History bears it out.
-Y
This is exactly what I was talking about. Excuse me if I’m wrong, but I’m assuming you’re an atheist, and like I said many just pick verses without understanding the context (though ironically they criticize Christians for taking verses literally :p )in which the verse was written. In the book of Timothy, Paul was writing to Apostle Timothy to give him advice and instruction on establishing a ministry in Ephesus and how the church was supposed to be run and which responsibilities were to be delegated to whom and so on.
So in that chapter Paul was telling Timothy what conduct was to be had in the church at the time, e.g women were to be modestly dressed, but be allowed to learn about the faith in the church with men. Following that in the King James version Timothy 2:12 reads “but I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to USURP authority over the man, but to be in silence. You have to consider what life was like in that part of the world and at that time, that it was probably more of a patriarchal society than someone living in America can probably imagine.
Their primary objective was spreading the gospel of Christ to as many people as they could. Using wisdom they’d want as few distractions in the church as possible to people learning Christ’s teachings. Women usurping or taking positions of leadership in the church would just create distractions and confusion to people in those communities, and they’d be having confusion and conflict over that and wouldn’t be accepting of the teachings which was the reason of the church’s establishment. So that verse is hardly saying Christianity’s stance is that women should never be in leadership over men, it was saying particularly in the Church they were to establish there that women were to be free to learn there but in subjection according to the only norm those people knew, and not teaching which would be in a position of leadership. All that would have caused then was chaos and people missing the point of them being there.
That verse is a great example of how people don’t understand the context of verses because they either don’t read the whole book or just pick out sentences and misunderstand what they mean. It’s also an example of how people use religion to perpetuate what they want because of people’s incomplete understanding of the text, similar to how people use Islam to spread extremist propaganda and attract people to terrorism.
Now for the verses about the husband being the head of the wife, and wives being asked to submit to their husbands. First of all, in that same chapter of Ephesians where wives are required to submit to their husbands, husbands are also required to love their wives as they love themselves and as Christ loves the Church, even to the extent of willingness to lay down their lives for their wives as Christ died for the Church. So neither the Bible nor the faith asks women to just be subject to their husbands who are free to just treat them however they wish.
Relationship experts today will tell you that men feel loved by being respected. Women conversely feel loved by affection and a man sacrificing for them. So God who created us knew our nature, which is why wives are required to submit to their husbands in respect, and husbands are required to love their wives every bit as much as they love themselves and to lay down their lives for their wives. So if a man loves his wife as himself, and would sacrifice for her to the point of dying for her then he wouldn’t be abusing his wife and treating her anyhow, would he?
We have no problem with what you say here. However you are skipping over 2,000 years of relational history of how men in power treat women. Yes, there were those men that treated women as they would have themselves treated. But history shows that women were not traditionally treated or thought of like this.
Historically, the church saw women as the reason men had to live in a cracked and broken world. It was because of a woman that mankind lived in pain and had to die. And there was no forgiveness for women. Its kind of like the church blamed Jews for crucifying Jesus. They were called “Christ killers” and pogroms were carried out against the Jews for centuries, culminating in the Holocaust. Women were the “betrayers of mankind.” Obviously the Bible doesn’t call Jews “Christ Killers.” Nowhere does it say they should be punished in any way for what happened to Jesus. Nowhere does it say that Jews should be put to death because of Jesus’ death. But that’s NOT the case for women.
In Genesis chapter 3 God reprimands Eve before Adam. He says: “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
He then points out that man’s sin was more listening to his wife rather than just eating the fruit. God says to Adam, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’ Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life.”
These condemnations by God put women in a degraded position in the eyes of the church, a position from which they have never recovered to this day. It is why Tertullian could state, “Women are “the devil’s gateway.” And, “Do you know that each of your women is an Eve? The sentence of God – on this sex of yours – lives in this age; the guilt must necessarily live, too. You are the gate of Hell, you are the temptress of the forbidden tree; you are the first deserter of the divine law.”
John Knox, the best known protestant theologian during the time of the Reformation after Luther and Calvin wrote in ‘The First Blast of the Trumpet’ that “God has pronounced sentence in these words: “Thy will shall be subject to thy husband, and he shall bear dominion over thee” (Gen. 3:16). As [though] God should say, “Forasmuch as you have abused your former condition, and because your free will has brought yourself and mankind into the bondage of Satan, I therefore will bring you in bondage to man. For where before your obedience should have been voluntary, now it shall be by constraint and by necessity; and that because you have deceived your man, you shall therefore be no longer mistress over your own appetites, over your own will or desires. For in you there is neither reason nor discretion which are able to moderate your affections, and therefore they shall be subject to the desire of your man. He shall be lord and governor, not only over your body, but even over your appetites and will.” This sentence, I say, did God pronounce against Eve and her daughters, as the rest of the scriptures do evidently witness. So that no woman can ever presume to reign above man”
In ‘The Hammer of Witches,’ a book on witch hunting endorsed and recommended by Pope Innocent VIII in 1484 AD, and used by the church for centuries, it is stated: “It should be noted that there was a defect in the formation of the first woman, since she was formed from a bent rib, that is, a rib of the breast, which is bent as it were in a contrary direction to man. And since through this defect she is an imperfect animal, she always deceives.”
Martin Luther taught, “God created Adam master and lord of living creatures, but Eve spoilt all, when she persuaded him to set himself above God’s will. ‘Tis you women, with your tricks and artifices, that lead men into error.” And, “I should have no compassion on these witches; I should burn them all.” And, “When I was a child there were many witches, and they bewitched both cattle and men, especially children.” And, “The word and works of God is quite clear, that women were made either to be wives or prostitutes.”
In modern times, this has not changed. Consider this by Christopher Whitecombe in ‘Eve’s Identity.’: “Eve represents everything about a woman a man should guard against. No matter what women might achieve in the world, the message of Genesis warns men not to trust them, and women not to trust themselves or each other. Whoever she might be and whatever her accomplishments, no woman can escape being identified with Eve, or being identified as her. In the West, the story of Eve has served over the centuries as the principal document in support of measures and laws to curtail and limit the actions, rights, and status of women. It is so deeply rooted in the socio-religious psyche of Western civilization that attempts to discredit it, or dismiss it, or simply ignore it as self-serving patriarchal fiction and myth-making have met with little success. Moreover this view of Eve and of women in general has been insinuated into the culture to such an extent that both men and women believe it defines a natural condition of women.”
Just something to think about when your paycheck isn’t equal to a man who’s doing the same job as you and not doing it as well as you.
-Y
Y, I’ve read and re-read this blog and I have to say that your commentary re this heinous crime is spot-on. One would think that everyone in Steubenville (except for the two rapists) would be totally supportive of the victim.
You haven’t been online at Xanga since early April and I’m hoping that your absence is not due to health issues. If that’s the case… I wish you a speedy recovery. I have missed your always-tell-it-like-it-is blogging style… your voice of reason.
In your absence it’s likely that you’ve missed hearing of the ongoing exodus from Xanga. Their pay to stay fee, to the tune of $48 bucks annually, comes to 13 cents per day… not all that bad… but… I’ve decided not to stay. My main concern is that Xanga will collect the fee and still go belly up.
If you wish to follow my blogs, my new blogging home is http://leftwinggrrr.blogspot.com/
My screen name is TrueBlueBloggerTom… decided to get my first name in there… somewhere…
Until I find a better avatar… or scare everyone with a real photo of me… I’ll still appear as Moses parting the “Red Sea”… the deep sea of Right Wing World.
I do hope you get to read this before Xanga’s mid-July deadline… I do believe that’s when they begin purging anyone who hasn’t ponied up their fee.
Take Care! You’ve made my Xanga experience joyful / memorable and I cherish your friendship.